# Resources — AI governance frameworks and the evidence they presume

> Markdown mirror for AI agents, generated 2026-08-25 from the live page.
> Canonical: https://agenticrail.nz/resources/
> Site context: https://agenticrail.nz/llms.txt

# Resources

Reference material on what the published AI governance frameworks actually demand of an autonomous agent, and on the execution evidence all of them presume.

### [AI Governance Frameworks 2026: EU AI Act, NIST RMF, ISO 42001](https://agenticrail.nz/resources/ai-governance-frameworks-2026/)

The three frameworks an agentic system is measured against, read side by side: what each one demands, where their requirements overlap, and the gap none of them closes. All three assume a record exists showing what an agent did and in what order. None of them specifies how that record is produced, who holds it, or what makes it credible to someone who does not trust the operator.

EU AI Act Article 14 · NIST AI RMF Manage 2.4 · ISO/IEC 42001 A.6.2.8

## Why this is one page and not a library

It is one guide because there is one thing worth saying here, and it is said in full. Adding thin summaries of the same three frameworks to lengthen this list would make the section larger and the site worse.

Related reading sits elsewhere on purpose: framework-specific analysis is on the [blog](https://agenticrail.nz/blog/), the enforcement specification and the standards mappings are under [spec](https://agenticrail.nz/spec/), and the plainly-stated compliance position, including what is *not* certified, is on the [FAQ](https://agenticrail.nz/faq/).

He toi whakairo, he mana tangata